Thursday, 11 November 2010

Burke and Hare

The Free Press is out again today and this week I’ve got two, yes TWO reviews in. The main one is the review of Rhod Gilbert live last week and I’ll put that up in due course, but the film review was for Burke and Hare which I saw at the cinema. It was cut down by half again due to space issues, but here’s the original, should you wish to read it:

 

The real life exploits of the 19th century grave-robbers turned murderers, William Burke and William Hare seem ideal source material for a cinematic thrill. Sadly, Burke and Hare, the new film from An American Werewolf in London director, John Landis does not do their story justice and at first glance it’s difficult to see why.

In the lead roles, Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis are more than capable as the eponymous duo and Jessica Hynes provides decent support as Serkis’ bawdy wife. In a true celebration of British talent, Tom Wilkinson, Tim Curry, and Ronnie Corbett all enjoy substantial roles, and there are brief cameos from horror stalwart Christopher Lee and director Michael Winner. Landis’ recreation of early 19th Century Edinburgh is convincing and his direction never seems less than that we’d expect from a veteran of his standard. The production is brought to us from Ealing Studios and harks back to that studio’s golden age where films such as Kind Hearts and Coronets and The Ladykillers dealt with murder in a wickedly funny and subversive way.

So why doesn’t it work? The main problem is the screenplay. Ultimately, no matter how hard the cast try, if the script isn’t up to scratch, the end product is unlikely to flourish. The film is pitched at the humorous end of the market – no danger of gritty realism here - but the laugh count simply isn’t high enough. Making an audience care about two murderers is a tough sell and this is accomplished but beyond that, there’s a feeling of a lost opportunity. The tone is confused; starting out slightly macabre and then introducing an awkward romantic subplot involving Isla Fisher (who has startling perfect teeth for a 19th century ex-prostitute). There’s nothing wrong with mixing genres but the film doesn’t seem confident enough in its own identity and unfortunately falls between two stools; neither funny enough for a comedy, nor dark enough for a dramatic horror.

I was really looking forward to this film and maybe that those high expectations led to the disappointment. It’s certainly not dreadful but you just feel it could have been so much better.

2 comments:

  1. I read a review that mainly just slagged off the attempts at Scottish accents (though I would have thought Ronnie Corbett might have managed ok). Anyway, nice review, not totally put me off seeing this. Ah, The Ladykillers - sublime! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks :)

    Not the first time the Lady Killers has cropped up on my blog - it "won" the L category too when I did my A-Z of my favourite films.

    http://jamielovell.blogspot.com/2009/12/z-of-favourite-films-flippin-el-its-l.html

    ReplyDelete